1. SAIYED SAEED ASHHAD, CJ. Petition bearing No. 583/2004 filed by the petitioner on the same facts, grounds and circumstances was dismissed by, this Court vide order dated 16.6.2004 with the direction to the petitioner to seek his remedy before a proper forum the petitioner has again invoked the Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. In tree present petition, the same facts and circumstances have been mentioned as were mentioned in C.P. No. 583/2004.
2. Mr. Rasheed Khan learned counsel for respondent No. 2 stated that the petitioner has nothing to do with the loan in question. He is neither a borrower nor guarantor or mortgager and is un- necessarily wasting the precious time of this Court by filing multiple petitions. With, regard to the contention of Ghulam Qadir Jatoi that respondent No. 2 has engaged the services of undesirable and Gooda elements to harass the petitioner and female relations of the petitioner. Mr. Rasheed Khan vehemently denied the same and submitted that the Bank is going to file Suit in accordance with law for recovery of the above amount and would not resort to illegal action, harassment or coercion either of the petitioner or of his family members.
3. For the foregoing reasons, we find that this Constitutional Petition is not maintainable and stands disposed of on above terms. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.