Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
2006 YLR 1828

Mehr MUHAMMAD YOUNIS vs THE STATE

Citation2006 YLR 1828
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Criminal Misc. No,7901-B of 2005
Date2005-10-27
Judge(s)M. Bilal Khan
ResultPetition dismissed

ORDER

' M. BILAL KHAN, J.---The petitioner who is in custody has been produced by Riaz Ali Inpector/Incharge Investigation Police Station Shalimar, Lahore.

2. This is an application for pre-arrest bail and Syed Hassan Qadir Shah, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in case F.I.R. No,412 of 2005 registered at Police Station Shalimar, Lahore, under section 489-F, P.P.C. The petitioner had been allowed ad interim pre-arrest bail by my learned brother Mian M. Najum-uz-Zaman, J. This morning. He added that the petitioner's instant bail application had also been filed in the office today and a prayer had been made for fixation of the same today; after having been allowed bail by my said learned brother, the petitioner came out of the Court room and was apprehended by a person in plain clothes who claimed to be an Assistant Sub-Inspector of police; on this, the Security Officer of this Court was informed who made necessary enquiries and found out that the person who had apprehended the petitioner was Siraj Din A.S.-I. From Police Station Shalimar.

3. The Security Officer present in the Court informs that he had brought the matter to the notice of my learned brother Mian M. Najum-uz-Zaman, J. Who had asked the former to enquire if the petitioner had been apprehended in case F.I.R. No,412 of 2005 or in some other case. The Inquiry revealed that his arrest was being sought in case F.I.R. No,383 of 2005, registered at Police Station Shalimar, under section 489-F, P.P.C. Which is the subject-matter of the instant bail application and not in the case in which he had been allowed ad interim pre-arrest bail, whereupon the petitioner was handed over to the police. His formal arrest has been shown vide Rappat No,19 dated 27-10- 2005. There is no substance in the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that once bail application has been filed in the office, the police cannot effect arrest of a person. The petitioner had already been formally arrested when this petition came up before this Court for hearing at 2-00 p.m. Therefore, this petition for pre-arrest bail having become infructuous is accordingly dismissed.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch