Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
2006 P Cr. L J 1784

MAQSOOD ALI vs THE STATE and anothers

Citation2006 P Cr. L J 1784
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Criminal Miscellaneous No,1869/B of 2006
Date2006-03-29
Judge(s)M. Bilal Khan
ResultBail confirmed

ORDER

' M. BILAL KHAN, J.--- Maqsood Ali son of Shah Muhammad, the petitioner, seeks pre-arrest bail in case F.I.R. No,169 of 2006, dated 13-2-2006, registered at Police Station Chak Jhumra, District Faisalabad, for an offence under section 382, P.P.C.

2. The allegation in the F.I.R. Registered at the instance of Sultan Mehmood son of Shah Muhammad, the complainant, was that he was a distributor of a company by the name of Media Com Cable Company, a few days before registration of the case they had laid underground Fibre Optical Cable at the cost of Rs,8, 00,000, the petitioner and his co-accused namely Abdul Ghafoor and Liaqat Ali dug out the cable and sold a part thereof causing a loss of Rs, One lac to him.

Resultantly the instant F.I.R. Had been recorded.

3. The petitioner's plea for pre-arrest bail did not find favor with the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Faisalabad, who dismissed his application vide order, dated 8-3-2006. Hence this petition.

4. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have perused the record brought by Abdul Maajid, A.S.-I. Police Station Chak Jhumra, District Faisalabad.

5. It has been observed that section 382, P.P.C. Has since been deleted and section 440, P.P.C. Has been inserted. According to the Investigating Officer no theft had occurred; however, underground cable had been damaged. A perusal of the police file also reveals that according to the Investigating Officer the petitioner was not present at the place of occurrence and had only abetted the offence. The two co-accused namely Ishtiaq Ahmad and Abdul Ghafoor who had been arrested have since been released on bail by the learned Judicial Magistrate. No recovery is to be effected from the petitioner as he has joined the investigation. The culpability of the petitioner under section 109, P.P.C. Calls for further probe within the meaning of subsection (2) of section 497, Cr.P.C.

6. Resultantly this petition is allowed and the ad interim pre-arrest bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 13-3-2006 is hereby confirmed.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch