' MIAN MUHAMMAD NAJAMUZ-ZAMAN, J.---Seeks cancellation of bail of respondents Muhammad Ramzan and Muhammad Arfan allowed by Additional Sessions Judge, Gojra vide order dated 16-11- 2005 in case F.I.R. No.486 of 2005 dated 29-10-2005 for the offence under sections 337-F(v) F-1, A2, L2 and 148/149, P.P.C. Registered at Police Station, Gojra District T.T. Singh.
2. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and going through the data available on the record, I have observed that Muhammad Arfan was admitted to bail by learned Additional Sessions Judge on the plea of alibi. The impugned order reveals that during the period from 25-10- 2005 to 29-10-2005 Muhammad Arfan respondent remained admitted to hospital in connection with Renal Colic disease, to this extent learned counsel is not in a position to place on the record any certificate from the competent officer/Doctor to say that respondent Muhammad Arfan never remained admitted in the Mayo Hospital for the aforesaid period. As far as Muhammad Ramzan respondent is concerned admittedly he had not caused any injury to any of the prosecution witness, the allegation against him is that at the relevant time he was armed with Carbine and had made firing. According to the record he is a man of advanced age and possibility of his involvement because of his relation with other co-accused could not be ruled out.
' In the said circumstances, the learned Additional Sessions Judge has rightly exercised the discretionary relief in favour of respondents. No ground for cancellation of bail is made out.
Dismissed.