After fully arguing the case, the learned counsel for the appellant i.e. PICIC, on instructions from the representative of PICIC (present in Court) seeks to unconditionally withdraw this appeal.
2. Contrarily, the learned counsel for the respondents protests that full arguments extending over two hearings have been made by both the sides, therefore, withdrawal should be disallowed.
3. Considering the fact that the respondents failed to file an appeal against the decree, we deem it appropriate to permit unconditional withdrawal of the appeal under Rule 1(1) of Order 23, CPC. As such, the appeal is dismissed as unconditionally withdrawn with no order as to the costs.
Accordingly.