Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
2006 MLD 1827

KAMRAN AHMED vs THE STATE

Citation2006 MLD 1827
CourtSindh High Court
Case No.Criminal Bail Application No,491 and M.A. No,925 of 2002
Date2002-05-21
Judge(s)S. A. Rabbani
ResultBail granted

ORDER

1. ' S.A. RABBANI, J.---Granted subject to all just exceptions.

2. F.I.R. In this case was lodged by one Arif Hafeez at Shara-e-Faisal Police Station, reporting murder of his brother Tariq Hafeez. The F.I.R.Was registered against unknown culprits. The case has been sent up for trial before 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Karachi (East). During the investigation, statement of one Usman Ali was recorded, under section 164, Cr.P.C., who claimed to be eye- witness and he stated that he saw applicant Kamran holding the deceased. The Investigating Officer also got recorded statement of one Mst. Chan Zeb, under section 164, Cr.P.C., who also claimed to be eye-witness of the incident. This statement was recorded on 18-10-2001, after more than six months of the incident.

2. ' Mr. Aamir Mansoob Qureshi, counsel for the applicant, submitted that the accused/applicant has not been nominated in the F.I.R. And the statements of alleged eye-witnesses under section 164, Cr.P.C. Were recorded after more than six months of the incident and the names of these witnesses were not mentioned in the F.I.R.

3. ' Mr. M.R. Syed, counsel for the complainant, submitted that there arc two eye-witnesses whose statements under section 164, Cr.P.C. Have been recorded and their version of those statements has not been challenged by way of cross-examination. The copies of statements of these witnesses recorded under section 164, Cr.P.C. Do not mention that they were recorded in presence of the accused/applicant and these statements even do not bear the signatures of the Magistrate.

4. ' Mr. Fazal-ur-Rahman Awan, State counsel, opposes the bail pleaon the ground that two alleged eye-witnesses have implicated the applicant.

5. The prosecution is relying upon the statements of two eyewitnesses mentioned above, recorded under section 164, Cr.P.C., but it was no mentioned in the F.I.R. That they were present at the scene of offence. These.Versions are yet to be subjected to cross-examination at the trial. In these circumstances this is a case of further inquiry. The applicant is admitted to bail subject to surety in the sum of Rs,200,000 (Rupees two hundred thousand) and PR bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch