1. ' The applicant has been implicated in the case of abduction of two learned Judges. The counsel for the applicant has stated that the abductees were released on 28-1-2005 and after more than 7 months i.e, on 17-9-2005 Identification Parade took place where the present applicant was brought before the abductees. Both the, abductees at the identification parade named the present applicant only as the one from whose house meals were supplied to them. They categorically stated that he was not the one who participated in the act of their abduction. Counsel for the applicant states that on the basis of the statements of the learned Judges, at this stage, common intention of the abduction cannot be attributed to the applicant. He further states that the identification parade took place after 7 months and error of human memory cannot be ruled out.
2. This Court therefore, finds that it is a case of further inquiry in terms of section 497 (ii), Cr.P.C., therefore, the applicant is enlarged on bail subject to his furnishing surety in the sum of Rs,200,000 and P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court.