' MUHAMMAD MUZAMMAL KHAN, J.---This civil revision assails the concurrent judgments and decrees dated 16-4-1990 and 17-10-1995, passed by learned Civil Judge and the learned Additional District Judge, respectively, deciding lis against the petitioners.
2. Precisely relevant facts are that Muhammad Yosaf respondent filed a suit for declaration claiming allotment/ possession of Plot No,5, Street No,4, Hassan Nasir Colony, Madina Town, measuring 4 Marlas. He pleaded that plot in question was allotted to him as per sale agreement dated 23-11-1979 vide Survey No,14/69 and he was issued possession slip by the petitioners on 18- 10-1977, wherever he has raised a house by expending a huge expense. The respondent further asserted that he had already deposited an amount of Rs,1,480 on different dates but after taking over of the scheme in question by the petitioners, he was refused deposit of remaining amount which necessitated filing of the suit.
3. The petitioners who were defendants in the suit filed their written statement and besides raising certain preliminary objections, pleaded that on account of the failure of the respondents to make payment of balance price, his plot was cancelled. Controversial pleadings of the parties necessitated framing of issues and recording of evidence. The learned trial Judge, seized of the matter after doing the needful vide judgment and decree dated 16-4-1990 decreed the suit of the respondent.
4. The petitioners aggrieved of the decision of the trial Court dated 16-4-1990 filed an appeal before the learned Additional District Judge, but remained unsuccessful as their appeal was dismissed on 17-10-1995. They have now come up in revisional jurisdiction of this Court for setting aside of judgments and decrees of the two Courts below.
5. Before arguing the case on merits the learned counsel for the petitioners offered to the respondent that if he is ready to pay the present reserved price of the plot at the rate of Rs,48,000 per Marla, he will not contest this revision petition, subject to deposit by the respondent, the remaining price of the land, within a period of 4 months. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent has readily accepted the offer of the petitioners and has shown willingness to deposit with the petitioners an amount of Rs,1,92,000, after deducting the amount already deposited by him, within a period of 4 months, as suggested by the petitioners. The respondent will approach the petitioners No,2 within 2 months period to have determination of the amount already paid by him by showing the receipt thereof and will have a challan form for deposit of remaining amount and the remaining amount shall be deposited on or before 31-5-2004 failing which his allotment of the plot in question shall be deemed to have cancelled. With these observations, the judgments and decrees dated 16-4-1990 and 17-10-1995 passed by the learned Civil Judge and the learned Additional District Judge, Faisalabad, are maintained subject to deposit by the respondent price of 4 Marlas at the rate of Rs,48,000 per Marla, (Rs,1,92,000) after deducting the amount deposited by him on or before 31-5-2004. Failure of the respondent to deposit this amount would meet the result as noted above. This civil revision is accordingly disposed of. There will be no order as to costs.