Pakistan Case Law← Search
2006 CLC 1519

COTTON WEAVERS (PVT.) LIMITED Through Managing Director And 3 Others

Citation2006 CLC 1519
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Civil Miscellaneous No. 1/C of 2005 and Regular First Appeal No.370 of 1998
Date2006-03-13
Judge(s)Mian Hamid Farooq, Syed Hamid Ali Shah
ResultOrder accordingly

ORDER

Civil Miscellaneous No.1/C of 2005 Instant application has been filed on behalf of one Inam-ul-Haq for impleading him as respondent in the appeal (Regular First Appeal No.370 of 1998) on the ground that he is a highest bidder. It has been stated that during the execution proceedings, auction of Property (bearing No.S-SVIII-44-S-b (shop No.2) measuring 126 sq. Ft. Situated at Waseem Arcade, Zaildar Road, Ichhra, Lahore) was held, under the orders of the learned executing Court and the applicant was declared as highest bidder, however, the sale has not yet been confirmed. The case of the applicant is that in this manner he has acquired a valuable right in the property, therefore, he is a proper and necessary party in the appeal.

2. None has entered appearance to prosecute this petition.

3. Messrs Cotton Weavers (Pvt.) Limited, through the appeal (Regular First Appeal No.370 of 1998) has called in question judgment and decree dated 15-4-1998, whereby suit for recovery of Rs.38,125,139.99 along with costs, was decreed against the appellants. The applicant is neither a decree-holder nor a judgment-debtor. Had the appeal arisen out of execution proceedings, the applicant, perhaps, may have some case. In the present appeal, the only question to be decided by this Court is as to whether the impugned decree was rightly and legally passed against the appellants or not. No right of the applicant is involved in the appeal. We are of the view that the applicant is neither a necessary nor a proper party. Besides the fact that none has entered appearance to prosecute the instant application, the same is also devoid of merits and thus, stands dismissed.

Main case

4. Both the learned counsel while placing on record photocopy of the agreement, dated 7-1-2005, statedly entered between the parties, state that they would be sufficiently contented if the present appeal is disposed of in terms of the said agreement.

5. In view of the joint request of the learned counsel for the parties the present appeal stands disposed of in terms of agreement, dated 7-1-2005, which is marked as Exh.C.l.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
Disclaimer·Privacy·Terms·Search