' SALIM KHAN, J.---The grievance of the present petitioner is that a suit between the parties was conducted at Haripur and an ex parte decree was passed in favour of the present petitioner for restitution of conjugal rights, but the respondent filed a Suit No,73/F.C. For recovery of dower etc. On 28-1-2005, against the mandatory provisions of section 9 read with section 12-A of Family Courts Act, 1964.
2. We heard the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioner, who referred to the contents of section 9 and contended that the plea of restitution of conjugal rights shall be made in a suit for dissolution of marriage, and the plea of dissolution of marriage shall be brought forward against the suit for restitution of conjugal rights, and separate suits shall not be filed in these circumstances. When confronted with thesame contents of section 9, the learned counsel for the petitioner was unable to show us anything in the said contents or in any other law to the effect that, even, suit for dower and maintenance allowance etc. Could not be filed when a suit for restitution of conjugal rights had already been filed or decided.
3. In order to facilitate the parties and get their dispute decided atone and the same forum, without keeping the parties apart, or in different Courts, the law has been amended to the effect that let the plea for dissolution of marriage be decided along with the suit for restitution of conjugal rights and vice versa. The West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, in its nature, specially with reference to its certain provisions, is a beneficial legislation, facilitating the parties to get justice as speedily as may be practicable. This law has never been intended to create hurdles, problems and difficulties for the spouses or for the Courts dealing with their matters. It was in this context that only the cases of restitution of conjugal rights and dissolution of marriage were prescribed to be dealt with in the same proceedings, while the cases of dower, dowry, maintenance, recovery of personal property of the wife and any other related matters covered by the provisions of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 may be dealt with independently.
4. We do not find any merit in the present writ petition which is hereby dismissed in limine.