1. MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR.-(l). The Assessing Officer, made certain additions in the income of the assessee under section 13(l)(aa); the assessee being dissatisfied with the above, challenged the order before the AAC, Lahore, who set aside the same and remanded the case to the Assessing Officer for de novo consideration. In the re-assessment, apart from the addition as made in the original order, the Assessing Officer also curtailed the agricultural income of the assessee from Rs.
2. 6,000,00 to Rs.3,000,00; this was challenged by the assessee through an appeal before the CIT(Appeals), who had deleted the addition out of the agricultural income and has also set aside the other addition. Being aggrieved, the department filed reference application before the Tribunal, which has been accepted and the order of the addition of Rs. 3,000,00 out of the agricultural income has been affirmed.
2. In the factual backdrop, the following three questions have been propounded in this reference:-
(a) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in law in restoring the order of the Assessing Officer, who has made the addition by turning down the explanation given by the applicant in a arbitrary manners and without bringing any material or evidence on record?
(b) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was justified in law to confirm the addition made out of the agriculture income by the Assessing Officer which was not made in the original assessm ent order by accepting the evidence in the shape of Affidavit and NIC.
3. Copy of the person to whom the trees were sold?
(c) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Lahore Tribunal was justified to confirm the addition of Rs. 300,000 made by the Assessing Officer under section 13(aa) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979?
4. The first question has not been pressed; however, after hearing learned counsel for the parties, we find that the question, whether the addition has been rightly made or curtailed, are the questions of fact, which has been determined by the Assessing Officer correctly and affirmed by the Tribunal.
5. We do not find that any question of law has arisen in the matter, rather as stated above, there are factual aspects, which have been conclusively adjudged by the forums below; this reference has no merit and is hereby declined.