1. ' GHULAM NABI SOOMRO, J.----Itis contended that on 13-7-2001 CIA Police had raided the village of the applicant and had asked the villagers to produce their weapons. It is further contended that other F.I.Rs,Nos.70 of 2001, 73 of 2001, 74 of 2001 and 68 of 2001 of Police Station Bakrani were registered mala fidely as in the most of the cases, the weapons were produced by the licence holders. In the case of the present applicant Bahadur also, the repeater gun is shownto be licensed one which is in the name of Liaquat Ali. It is contended further that the prosecution story is false, the gun in the case was not secured by police during patrolling. The number of F.I.Rs, registered against persons of the same village falsifies the prosecution story. It is lastly contended that it is yet to be determined whether the offence would fall under S.13 of Arms Ordinance or under the Surrender of Illicit Arms Act, 1991.
2. ' Learned counsel for the State has not opposed the bail plea of the applicant.
3. ' It is yet to be determined whether in the circumstances and the facts disclosed in the F.I.R., the offence would fall under the Ordinance of 1965 or under the Act of 1991. In any case, under the Act, 1991 also maximum sentence for three years' R.I. Is provided. Bail is, therefore, granted to the applicant subject to his furnishing a solvent surety in the sum of Rs,50,000 and P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of Additional Registrar of this Court.
4. ' Criminal Bail Application No,541 of 2001 stands disposed of along with listed applications.