1. MUHAMMAD AKRAM, J;-This is a petition for special leave from an order dated 31st of January 1979, passed by a learned Judge of the Lahore High Court at Lahore in Writ Petition No. 833 of 1977, filed by the respondent herein against the present petitioners.
2. Briefly stated the dispute in this case relates to the fixation of the terms and conditions of service of the respondent Lt.-Col. (Rtd.) :J. D. Malik, in his capacity as a member of the West Pakistan Co- operative Board set up by the Provincial Government with effect from the 7th of May, 1962 in exercise of the powers conferred on it by section 3 of the West Pakistan (Co-operative) Board Ordinance XIV of 1962 and the emolu--ments drawn by him ever since. In anticipation of the constitution of the Board, Mr. Riazuddin Ahmad, the then Commissioner, Co-operative Societies, West Pakistan addressed a D. O. Letter on the 16th of February, 1962, to the respondent who was at the time serving in East Pakistan, as Chairman of the Small Industries Corporation, Dacca, informing him that he had proposed his name for appointment as a Member of the West Pakistan Co-operative Board for the Department of Industries, Trade and Transport on a salary of Rs. 1,400 p. m. . He was further informed that the order of his appointment was likely to be issued in about 10 days time. The respondent accepted this offer and resumed the charge of his appointment with effect from 13th of May, 1962. In course of tine disputes and differences arose between the parties about the terms and conditions of service of the respondent and the emoluments drawn by hint, The matter was ultimately taken upto the level of the Supreme Court in cross appeals by special leave filed by the aggrieved parties and those were eventually disposed of by a learned Bench of this Court by a consolidated order passed on the 2nd of May 1974. In conclusion this Court held as under:--- "The final and simple position which therefore, emerges in this case is that Lt.-Col. J. D. Malik was entitled to emoluments at the rate of Rs. 1,400 p. m. In addition to his Army pension in terms of the contract offered to him by Mr. Riaz-ud-Din Ahmad and accepted by him when he assumed office as Member of the Board with effect from the 13th of May, 1962. He was not entitled as of right, to claim any other allowances, privileges, facilities or special pay, by reference to, any orders issued by the Central Government from time to time, nor could his terms be varied by the Provincial Government orders dated the 31st of August, 1963. On this view of the matter, had is liable to refund any amounts or advances which he. Has drawn in. Excess of his true entitlement, and which have not been otherwise authorised by the competent authority. It is of course always open to the Government to make any ex gratial payment if it so desires."
3. "Let respondent No. 1 (petitioner No. 1 herein) therefore, hear the petitioner (respondent 'No. 1) and decide the dispute in the light of the decision of the Supreme Court and submit a report to be received within two months."
4. It is against this order that the two petitioners have filed this petition for special leave, while the aforementioned writ petition filed by the respondent against them is still pending in the High Court at Lahore.
5. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners in this petition before us. The impugned order passed by the High Court is eminently just and fair in directing the petitioners to hear the respondent and decide the dispute afresh in the light of 'the decision of the Supreme Court. There could be no grievance against allowing the respondent to be heard in disposing of the outstanding dispute in the light of the judgment, already delivered by the Supreme Court. We therefore, find that this is hardly a fit case for interference by this Court in these proceedings. This petition has no force and is therefore, rejected.