1. M. R. KHAN, J.-The petitioners were convicted under section 323 of the Pakistan Penal Code and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 100 each. The petitioners' appeal against their convic--tion and sentences was dismissed. Their criminal revision was also dismissed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court of East Pakistan. The petitioners now seek special leave to appeal against the High Court's order dismissing the criminal revision.
2. The prosecution case was that while P. W. 2 Abdul Mannan was going to Narsingdi on the morning of the 14th August 1967, for making some purchases, he was surrounded and assaulted by the petitioners with iron rods and lathis. The petitioners admittedly bore grudge and enmity against Abdul Mannan and his uncle P. W. 1 Kala Gazi. The occurrence was witnessed by P. Ws. 1, 3, 4 and 5.
3. Both the Courts of fact believed the evidence of these eye-witnesses and that of the victim himself.
4. The Medical Officer of the Narsingdi Public Dispensary examined P. W. 2 and found two simple injuries on his person caused by blunt weapons. The medical evidence thus corroborated the evidence of the eye-witnesses. An attempt was made to belittle the doctor's evidence, but the Courts accepted his evidence as he was an independent witness.
5. The petition has no merits and is, accordingly, dismissed. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.