1. ' The petitioner Abdul Razak is aggrieved with the demand notice for recovery of property tax at Rs.74,865 for the period from the year, 1991 to the years, 2004.
2. ' It is stated in the petition that Flat No.B-4, IInd Flcior, on Plot No.G-17/B-III, (Al-Habib Garden) Clifton, Karachi, was purchased by his mother Mst. Shafiat Bano, who has expired and the petitioner is her legal heir. It was purchased on 28th of June, 1990, and thereafter the house tax was not assessed.
3. The main objection of the petitioner is that the house tax cannot be recovered for more than three years for the first time in one go.
4. ' During the course of proceedings, the petitioner who is appearing in person has contended that while imposing house tax the provisions contained in Chapter-V of the Cantonment Act, 1924, have not been complied with. He has however, no objection to the recovery of house tax at the annual rental value of Rs.51,000 for three years namely, 2002, 2003 and 2004.
5. ' We have heard the petitioner/ Advocate in person and Mr. Sohail H.K. Rana, Advocate for the respondents Nos. 1 and 2.
6. The record has been produced before us and we have found that the compliance of the relevant provisions in Chapter-V of the Cantonment Act, 1924, relating to the imposition of taxation have not been made.
7. ' A perusal of the file shows that the notice under section 68 of the Cantonment Act, 1924 has not been served on the petitioner, who is the occupier and legal heir of the owner Mst. Shafiat Bano.
8. ' Since the petitioner is prepared to pay house tax for three years as narrated above, therefore, the petition is disposed of in the following terms:- "(1) That the Cantonment Board, Clifton shall issue a demand notice to the petitioner for the period of the three years i.e. 2002, 2003 and 2004 within 15 days from today and the petitioner shall pay the same.
(2) So far, the contention that the house tax cannot be recovered for more than three years, we have not been shown any provision in this behalf and consequently, this contention is not accepted.
(3) For the earlier years the Cantonment Board, Clifton shall be at liberty to initiate the proceedings strictly in accordance with law as contained in Chapter-V of the Cantonment Act, 1924. Likewise, if the assessm ent is revised it shall be done strictly in accordance with the provisions contained in Chapter-V of the Cantonment Act, 1924. Without complying with the provisions of Chapter-V of the Cantonment Act, 1924, the Cantonment Board, Clifton shall not recovery any house tax from the petitioner for the period prior to the year, 2002."