' This order will be read in continuation of my order dated 16-12-2004. Learned counsel for the petitioner adds that complainant has been making different applications and naming different accused at different stages. He further submits that in the earlier investigation, petitioner was found innocent, that offences alleged against the petitioner do not fall within the ambit of section 497(1), Cr.P.C. And that bail before arrest already granted to the petitioner be confirmed.
2. This case was taken up an hour before and I had asked learned State counsel to go through the whole files and after going through the whole police file, he comes to the conclusion that in the second investigation, petitioner was found guilty. One should keep in mind, this is a bail before arrest petition and consideration for the grant of bail before arrest and after arrest are totally different. Even before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, he also slipped away from the Court, when he was dictating the order. No case for bail before arrest is made out therefore, this petition is dismissed.
Bail .