1. ' Mr. Riaz Hanif Rahi, Advocate and Muhammad Ibrahim (Respondent No.2 in W. P. No.2018- 2005/BWP) are present in person in the Court. Let statement of Muhammad Ibrahim be recorded on a separate sheet.
2. ' Presence as before.
3. ' Statement of Muhammad Ibrahim has been recorded. During the recording of statement of Muhammad Ibrahim, Mr. Riaz Hanif, Advocate has repeatedly interrupted the Court proceedings and has tried to guide Muhammad Ibrahim in making his statement upon which he was asked to take his seat.
2. Let statement of Mr. Riaz Hanif Rahi, Advocate be recorded on a separate sheet to explain the show-cause notice of contempt.
4. ' Presence as before.
5. Statement of Mr. Riaz Hanif Rahi, Advocate has been recorded on a separate sheet in which he has admitted that he had uttered the sentences/words on 18-7-2005, which has been read over to him by this Court again today. As Mr. Riaz Hanif Rahi, Advocate has not been able to explain his acts, deeds, actions as noted in the judgment announced today, filing of applications, (C.Ms), utterances of contemptuous sentences during the arguments, interruption in Court proceedings, etc., and no satisfactory explanation having been tendered, I hold the contemner to have committee contempt of this Court. It may be noted that instead of showing regret or tendering for the pardon he has again shown a stubborn attitude. Therefore, I award him the sentence of one month R.I. And impose a fine of Rs.30,000 (Rupees thirty thousand only) under Article 204 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 read with Contempt of Court Ordinance No.1 of 2004. In case of default to pay the fine, he is to suffer one month more simple imprisonment.
6. Contemner convicted.