' The petitioner seeks post-arrest bail' in a case F.I.R. No.325 of 2003 dated 15-7-2003 registered under sections 10/11/79. Hudood Ordinance at Police Station Sammndri, District Faisalabad.
2. The allegation against the petitioner according to the contents of the F.I.R. Is that he along with his co-accused abducted Mst. Naveed Anjum and Mst. Naureen Anjum for the purpose of committing Zina with them.
3. Post-arrest bail of the petitioner was declined by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sammundri vide his order dated 19-12-2003.
4. I have heard the arguments of the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that during the investigation of the case, the petitioner along with co-accused were found innocent and no recovery has been effected from the petitioner and his co-accused. The learned counsel for the State when confronted with this position could not respond.
6. The petitioner has been declared innocent and the abductees were recovered from some other persons. Statements under section 164, Cr.P.C. Of the said abductees have been recorded, wherein they have not levelled any allegation of abduction or Zina against the petitioner and his co- accused.
7. For the foregoing reasons and without prejudicing the merits of the case, the petitioner is admitted to post-arrest bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.50,000 (rupees fifty thousand) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Area Magistrate/Duty Magistrate concerned. Copy dasti.