1. ' This Constitution petition was preferred against the conviction awarded to the petitioner by Field General Court Martial for the charge under section 302, P.P.C. For committing the murder of his fellowship. This petition was admitted to regular hearing vide order dated 14-11-1995 to the following effect:-- "In view of the above, the writ petition is admitted. Notice to the respondents, which is accepted by the learned counsel for the State, who is present before the Court. There is a law point involved in this case, it is in the interest of justice that the execution of death sentence awarded to the petitioner is suspended till the final decision of the writ petition."
2. ' During the pendency of present petition another Constitution Petition bearing No.17 of 1994 filed on behalf of present petitioner questioning the validity of conviction by Field General Court Martial before this Court was dismissed vide order dated 18-5-1995. The petitioner through a Jail petition challenged the said order before the apex Court and the leave was granted in the said Jail petition vide order dated 6-10-1996 and subsequently the appeal of the petitioner was dismissed by apex Court vide order dated 14-10-1996. The review petition filed by the petitioner was also dismissed vide order dated 9-3-1999 by the apex Court.
3. ' The learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that notwithstanding the dismissal of appeal and review petition by apex Court, the execution of sentence pending final disposal of this petition would be in violation of order dated 14-11-1995 passed by this Court.
4. ' The learned Deputy Attorney-General on instructions from Colonel Iqbal Hashmi states that this petition was pending at the time when another petition filed by the present petitioner was dismissed and, therefore, the order in the present petition lost its efficacy.
5. We having heard the learned counsel for the parties and gone through the judgment find that on the same subject, two independent petitions were filed and during the pendency of present petition, the Writ Petition No.1032 of 1994 was dismissed and the matter was finally adjudicated upon by the apex Court, therefore, the order in the present petition would be of no consequence.
6. We, therefore, dispose of this petition having become infructuous with an observation that the petitioner may seek alternate remedy, if any, available to him for the redressal of his grievance.