ORDER KHALIL-UR-REHMAN RAMADY, J.-- The learned Service Tribunal held a detailed inquiry into >the reasons which had led to compulsory retirement of the respondent- DSP and having examined the entire record of the respondent's long service in the Police Departments, found that the grounds which had allegedly led to the impugned compulsory retirement of the respondent were vague, unspecific and bald accusations and not even an iota of material was available on record in support of the same. Even the so-called secret agency which had reported against the respondent had never even mentioned the names of the persons allegedly killed by the respondent in fake police encounters or the names of the terrorists of bomb blasts who had been released by the respondent or the identification or description of the property which the respondent had allegedly accumulated through illegal gratification received by him.
2: We have heard the learned ASC for the petition .Vat some length and have also perused the available record in the light of the submissions made by him and find that no exception could be taken to the findings recorded by the learned Service Tribunal. The learned ASC for the petitioners could not point out any infirmity in the impugned judgment which could have qualified the petitioners for the grant of leave under Article 212(3) of the Constitution.
3. This petition is, therefore, dismissed.