' IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, J.--- This petition for leave to appeal is filed against order, dated 15-9-2004 of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, whereby Civil Revision No,2285 of 2004 filed by the petitioner against findings recorded by the trial Court dated 4-2-2003 and the First Appellate Court dated 26-7-2004, have been dismissed.
2. Precisely stating facts of the case are that petitioner filed a suit for possession through specific performance of agreement to sell dated 22-7-1989 (Exh.P.1) against the respondent in respect of the property description whereof has been given therein. The suit was- contested by other side pleading that Exh.P.1 was a forged document. Learned trial Court having recorded evidence and taking into consideration the respective pleas of the parties, dismissed the suit. Learned First Appellate Court maintained findings of fact recorded by the trial Court.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that evidence produced by the petitioner through P.W.3 Malik Shoukat Ali and other witness has been discarded without any legal justification.
4. We have heard learned counsel and have also gone through the statement of P.W.3 carefully. It is true that P.W.3 is scribe of the document but he had failed to furnish trustworthy evidence to establish that the transaction in respect of sale of land took place between the parties in pursuance whereof the petitioner paid Rs,1, 00,000 out of total sale consideration of Rs,1,25,000.
Since the document (Exh.P.1) has not been proved on record according to law, therefore, no exception can be taken to the impugned judgment which is based on correct appreciation of evidence available on record.
5. Thus, for the foregoing reasons, petition is dismissed and leave declined.