' The appellant, namely, Sajjad Hussain son of Nazar Muhammad was tried by the learned Judicial Magistrate Section 30, Sargodha in case F.I.R. No, 274 of 2001, registered at Police Station, Sahiwal; District Sargodha for offences under sections 324, 109, P.P.C. The learned trial Magistrate, by virtue of his judgment, dated 19-2-2004 found him guilty of the said charge, convicted and sentenced him as under:--
(i) Under section 324, P.P.C.
' To undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years with a fine of Rs,20,000 or in default of payment thereof to further undergo simple imprisonment for one years.
(ii) Under section 337-F(iv), P.P.C.
' To suffer rigorous imprisonment for two year as Tazir with further direction to pay an amount of Rs,10,000 as Daman to Najam-ul-Hassan injured P.W.
(iii) Under section 337-F(vi), P.P.C.
' To suffer rigorous imprisonment for three years with further direction to pay a sum of Rs,20,000 as Daman to Najam-ulHassan injured P.W.
(iv) Under section 337-F(v), P.P.C.
' To undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years as Tazir with further direction to pay a sum of Rs,10,000 as Daman to Najamul-Hassan injured P.W.
' All the sentences awarded to appellant were ordered to run concurrently. Benefit of section 382-B, Cr.P.C. Was also granted to him.
2. The appellant by filing the instant appeal has called in question convictions and sentences awarded to him through the impugned judgment. During pendency of the same, an application under section 345, Cr.P.C. Bearing Criminal Miscellaneous No,1695/M of 2004, duly supported by affidavits of the complainant and the injured P.W., was filed on behalf of the appellant seeking his acquittal on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.
3. Today, Zamir-ul-Hassan, the complainant, and Najam-ulHassan, injured P.W. Have appeared in Court and affirmed the factum of compromise arrived at between them and the appellant. They stated that they have forgiven the appellant in the name of Almighty Allah and have no objection, if he is acquitted of the charge.
4. In view of above situation, I am satisfied with regard to the genuineness and correctness of the compromise arrived at between the parties.
5. Accordingly, I accept this appeal, set aside the conviction and sentences awarded to the appellant and acquit him of the charge. He is directed to be released from jail forthwith if not required in any other case. Criminal Miscellaneous No,1695/M of 2004 also stands disposed of.