' MUHAMMAD FARRUKH MAHMUD, J.---Vide judgment, dated 25-3-1999. Qadeer Mohy-ud-Din (petitioner) was convicted by the learned Judge, Anti-Terrorism Court-II, Bahawalpur, for offence under section 302/ 34, P.P.C., read with section 7 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, and sentenced to death. The petitioner was also directed to pay Rs,1,00,000 to the legal heirs of the deceased, in default thereof he was to suffer R.I. For two years. The petitioner was also convicted for offence under section 392/34, P.P.C. And sentenced to imprisonment for five years. Fine of Rs,10,000 was imposed upon the petitioner as compensation, in default thereof he was to undergo further R.I. For six months.
' Vide judgment, dated 7-5-1999 the appeal filed by the petitioner was dismissed and the death sentence was confirmed. Thereafter the petitioner approached the Hon'ble Supreme Court vide Jail Appeal No, 90 of 1999 -SCJ, which was also dismissed vide judgment, dated 4-2-2002. Before execution of sentence, the legal heir of deceased Abdul Salam entered into compromise with the petitioner. The learned Trial Court after accepting the compromise effected between the parties acquitted the petitioner from the offence under section 302, P.P.C. But convicted him for offence under section 311, P.P.C. And sentenced him to undergo five years R.I. The petitioner was also directed to pay Rs,1,78,235 as Diyat to be distributed between the minor children of the deceased.
The conviction and the sentence passed for offence under section 392, P.P.C. Was maintained.
However, the learned trial Court vide judgment, dated 9-10-2000 directed that the sentences awarded to the petitioner would run concurrently and the benefit of section 382-B, Cr.P.C. Would be extended to him.
2. Through this petition, the petitioner has sought his release on bail in accordance with the section 331, P.P.C. On the ground that the petitioner has served out his sentence and was suffering in Jail because of non-payment of Diyat.
3. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record. According to the report, dated 4-12-2003 submitted by the Superintendent, New Central Jail, Bahawalpur, the petitioner had served out his sentence since 21-9-2002 and was longing in Jail for non-payment of Diyat amounting to Rs,1,78,235. Subsection (2) of section 331, P.P.C. Enable this Court to release the petitioner on bail for the purpose of payment of Diyat.
4. Thus we admit the petitioner to bail, subject to his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs,1,78,235, with two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. The petitioner may pay the amount of Diyat in lump sum C or in instalments within a period of three years. In case the petitioner does not pay the amount of Diyat by 17-3-2007, he would be re-taken, into custody and would be kept in Jail till the payment of Diyat amount i.e, Rs,1,78,235.