KH. MUHAMMAD SHARIF, J.-- lt is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that three persons from the side of the petitioner, namely, Safiullah (petitioner), Saeed and Sharif were also injured but their injuries have been suppressed; that there is only one injury on the head of the injured-complainant; that is a case of two versions and that the case of the petitioner is one of further inquiry.
2. Learned State counsel submits that two of the accused persons are found to be innocent as they were present in Karachi.
3. ASI present in Court submits that during investigation, it came to light that three persons from the side of the petitioner were injured including the petitioner but their injuries are not mentioned in the FIR and that the challan has been submitted in the FIR and the cross-version on 16.9.2004.
3. Heard. Without going into the merits of the case, lest it may prejudice case of either side, record shows that that it is a case of cross version, lt is for the learned Trial Court to see as to which was the aggressor one but presently I fined that, to the extent of the petitioner, lt is a case of further inquiry. Resultantly, this petition is allowed and the petitioner is admitted to bail provided he furnishes bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 30,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court.