' SH. RIAZ AHMAD, C.J.--- Leave to appeal is sought against the judgment dated 29-4-2003 of the Lahore High Court, Lahore whereby Criminal Appeal No,361 of 2003 preferred by the petitioner against his conviction and sentence awarded to him by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kamalia under section 9(b) of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997, was dismissed.
2. On 19-3-1999 petitioner while in possession of heroin weighing 200 grams was apprehended red- handed by a raiding police party. The trial Court vide judgment, dated 21-2-2003 convicted and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for eight (8) months plus fine of Rs,5,000 or in default thereof, to undergo simple imprisonment for two months. Benefit of section 382-B, Cr.P.C.
Was also extended to the petitioner.
3. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner at length and have also gone through the judgment impugned. It was urged by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner, who was a school teacher, had been falsely implicated in the case by the police. Unfortunately, nothing was brought on record to substantiate the false implication of the petitioner by the police. No illegality or infirmity in the impugned judgment has been pointed out by the learned counsel warranting interference by this Court, therefore, this petition being devoid of merit is dismissed and leave to appeal declined accordingly. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.