' Muhammad Karamat Subhani, the petitioner, by filing this Constitutional petition, seeks quashing of F.I.R. No,120, dated 18-2-2005, registered at Police Station, Kahna, District, Lahore for an offence under section 365, P.P.C. At the instance of Muhammad Hanif alias Bhola son of Umar Din, the father of the petitioner.
2. The F.I.R. Contained allegation about the alleged abduction of the petitioner. It is stated that the petitioner had not been abducted and that the contents of the F.I.R. Were not correct. On a previous occasion, too, the petitioner had moved Writ Petition No,3204 of 2005 seeking same relief. However, vide order dated 4-3-2005, this Court while disposing of the said writ petition had directed the Investigating Officer to faithfully record the statement of the petitioner and conduct investigation strictly in accordance with law.
3. It is now complained that despite recording the statement of the petitioner, the S.H.O. Had not proceeded to cancel the case, which according to the learned counsel, should have been the logical consequence after the petitioner had refuted the allegations in the F.I.R.
4. While dealing with Writ Petition No,3204 of 2005, I had some doubts about the antecedents of the petitioner and even today I expressed my reservations about his credentials and asked the learned counsel as to how the petitioner, who claims himself to be a self-righteous and pious person has been filing petitions, one after the other against his won parents. The documents attached with the instant petition also reveal that apart from filing this writ petition, the petitioner has been filing petitions against her mother to the Court of Session. One such petition is dated 6-5-2003 and is annex `C' with this petition. I have got no doubt in my mind that it is someone else, who is pulling the strings and the petitioner, who is a boy of impressionable age, is being exploited. It is surprising that none of the persons against whom the F.I.R. in question had been registered ever turned up to seek the requisite relief. If the petitioner, as claimed by him, had never been abducted and his statement to this effect had been recorded by the Investigating Officer, then he is left with no grievance and there is no logic in his coming to the Court time and again seeking cancellation of the case. Even otherwise, the petitioner has the audacity of tarnishing the character of his own sisters and has placed, as annex `B', a clipping from a newspaper wherein a woman alleged to be his sister has been shown in different enticing postures. It C does not a person, who has been trumpeting about his piety and godliness to malign and blacken the names of the people left, right and center including his own real sisters, mother and father. Thus the conduct exhibited by the petitioner shows the depravity of his own character inasmuch as the religion of Islam ordains the children to show undiluted fidelity and loyalty towards their parents. Unfortunately the demeanor of the petitioner and the way he is conducting himself is a direct affront to the sacred teachings of Islam.
5. As already stated, this petition appears to be manipulated and the same is accordingly dismissed in limine..