IFTIKHAR Muhammad CHAUDHRY, ACJ.-Th petitioners being aggrieved of the judgment dated 10-9- 20c of the Lahore High Court has instituted present petition for leave to appeal. Concluding para from impugned judgment is reproduced below:-- "As a result of the above discussion, this Regular Second Appeal is allowed and the judgment and decree dated 24-5-1987 so far as it relates to the dismissal of the appeal of Ali Muhammad and others and the acceptance of the appeal of Muhammad Din are reversed and the to the learned First Appellate Court to decide the Civil Appeal No. 242/86 Ali Muhammad vs. Ismail and Civil Appeal No. 244/86 Muhammad Din vs. Ali Muhammad on merits in accordance with law. As this is an old case, the learned District Judge may decide the appeals within six months of this order.
Parties are to bear their own costs."
2. Learned counsel addressed arguments in support of the petition and stated that High Court in exercise of jurisdiction under Order LXI Rule 20 CPC may have not directed to implead some the respondents who were not before it, therefore, according to him, interference is called for in the impugned judgment. In our opinion, the order seems to be just and proper in the circumstances of the case, thus we are not inclined to interfere in the same. However, in the interest of justice we direct the learned District Judge, Bahalwalopur, on whose file the appeals are pending, to dispose of the same expeditiously as far as possible within a period of three months. A copy of the judgment shall be sent to the Registrar of this Court for our perusal in Chambers.
3. With the above observation, petition is dismissed.