Pakistan Case Law← Search
K.L.R. 2005 Criminal Cases 189

Muhammad Ishaq And 3 Other vs The State

CitationK.L.R. 2005 Criminal Cases 189
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Criminal Miscellaneous No. 9175-B of 2004,
Date2004-12-23
Judge(s)Khawaja Muhammad Sharif
ResultBail after arrest granted.

ORDER

KH. MUHAMMAD SHARIF, J,~ I had already granted bail to Habib Ullah etc. In Crl. Misc. No. 8625/B/2004, who were accused in cross-version and in the instant case, FIR was registered on behalf of said party.

2. Allegations against Muhammad Ishaq, Shah Jahan and Umer Hayat petitioners are that they had caused simple injuries on the persons of Asad Ullah, Habib Ullah and Hameed Ullah while allegation against Muhammad Khan petitioner is that he had caused an injury on the finger of the deceased while Umar Hayat and Muhammad Hayat, who are petitioner before this Court, had caused injuries on the vital parts of the body of the deceased.

3. Leaned counsel for the petitioner submits that two challans have been submitted and now it is a case of two versions, so case of the petitioner is of further inquiry falling under section (2) of Section 497, Cr.P.C.

4. On the band, learned counsel for the State assisted by leaned counsel for the complainant submits that FIR is not a substantive piece of evidence but admits that injuries of the petitioners side have been suppressed by the prosecution have been suppressed by the prosecution in the FIR, that five witnesses in challan case have been examined by the learned Trial Court, so at this stage, bail should not be granted to the petitioners.

5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. As far as, petitioners Nos. 1 to 3 are concerned, they did not cause any injury to the deceased. So far as, Muhammad Khan petitioner No. 4 is concerned, he was armed with sota, he caused simple injury on the. Finger of the deceased while two co- accused Umer Hayat and Muhammad Hayat, who are not petitioner before this Court, have caused injuries on the vital parts of -the body of the deceased. Though the learned Trial Court has examined five witnesses in challan case but it will take lot of time from both the sides because in both challan and cross version the learned Trial Court shall deliver judgments separately. Presently, lt is a case of two versions and covered by sub-section (2) of Section 497, Cr.P.C., therefore, this petition is accepted. Petitioners are allowed bail subject to furnishing bail bonds to the tune of Rs.

50,000/- (Fifty thousand) each with one surety each in the like-amount to the satisfaction of learned Trial Court.

For educational and research use only β€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerΒ·PrivacyΒ·TermsΒ·Search