1. ' The petitioner is complainant of case F.I.R. No, 27, dated 4-5-2004, under sections 324/109/34, P.P.C. Registered at P.S. Nowshera, Khushab, and seeks cancellation of pre-arrest bail granted to respondent Muhammad Dawood by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Khushab vide order, dated 10-6-2004.
2. ' The allegation against the respondent is that he raised Lalkara while his co-accused Alzaal who is still at large caused successive fires on vital parts of Salah Muhammad brother of the complainant and the respondent was not entitled for grant pre-arrest bail, therefore, it has been prayed that concession of pre-arrest bail granted to the respondent be withdrawn. In support of his contentions the learned counsel has placed reliance on PLD 1984 SC 192 and NLR 1995 277.
3. ' The petitioner has been opposed by learned counsel for respondent No,1 who by placing reliance on 1986 SCM R 1386 and 1991 M LD 579 has argued that principle for cancellation and for grant of bail are entirely different. Respondent No,1 had no blood relation with the main accused, therefore, there was no occasion to raise Lalkara and the respondent was rightly allowed pre-arrest bail.
4. ' Learned counsel for the State has supported learned counsel for the petitioner.
5. ' After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, I find that the accused has no blood relation with his co-accused, whether Lalkara attributed to the respondent was commanding in nature or proverbial, is to be seen by the Trial Court after recording of evidence. There is no allegation of misusing of concession of bail, therefore, no ground for cancellation of bail is made out. The petition stands dismissed.