MIAN SAQIB NISAR. J.---It is stated by the learned counsel for the appellants that the property was originally owned by Muhammad Shafique and his wife Mst. Parveen Kausar to the extent of 3/4th and 1/4th share respectively. Muhammad Shafique died and his share in the property devolved upon four sons, two daughters and widow; out of this share, the widow inherited 1/8th share while the brothers and sisters have inherited their due share according to the Muhammadan Law of inheritance: resultantly, the property in question cannot be sold as whole for the decree, passed against the appellants Nos.5, 6 and 7 and the Court in fact, should have determined the shares of the judgments-debtor's and only could have put on sale such share and not the entire property.
2. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and find that the contentions of the learned counsel for the appellants are correct, therefore, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is sent back to the learned Banking Court for determining the exact shares of each of the present appellants, and thereafter, to sell the shares of only appellants Nos.5, 6 and 7. This appeal is accordingly disposed of. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.