1. C.M. No.1 of 2005.
2. The applicant, through the instant application, has sought the condonation of delay, in fling the instant appeal, which has been filed after the lapse of about two years.
2. The only ground taken for the condonation for the delay is that the applicant has been agitating the matter before Ministry of Industries and Production through Privatization Commission. No specific date has been mentioned in the application about the fact that when the Government of Pakistan was approached and when the request of the petitioner was declined. There is no proof with regard to the fact that the Government of Pakistan has ever been approached or the request was ever entertained. The delay of each day has to be explained. The applicant has failed to explain unreasonable delay of about two years in filing the appeal. The application is without merit and is dismissed.
3. Main Appeal.
4. The appeal in hand has not been filed within the period of limitation. The application for the condonation of delay has been dismissed. The appeal being barred by limitation is also dismissed. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.