1. By this appeal under section 196 of the Customs Act, 1969, while challenging the judgment, dated 11-12-2002 passed by the Customs, Excise and Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Karachi, following question of law has been raised by the appellant:-- "Whether the Appellate Tribunal can pass an order under the proviso of sub-clause (b) of section 194-A of the Customs Act 1969, which is an omitted sub-clause and not alive at the time of judgment. Further the said clause has no relevancy whatsoever with the nature of the case?"
2. Mr. Muhammad Aslam Shaikh, learned counsel for the appellant, has referred to the Finance Ordinance, 2000, which came into force on at once i.e. 19th June, 2000, to show that section 194- A(b) on the basis of which the appeal preferred by the appellant was dismissed by the Tribunal for want of jurisdiction was omitted much earlier to the passing of impugned order against the appellant. He submitted that for this short reason impugned order is misconceived and is liable to be set aside.
3. Raja Muhammad Iqbal, learned counsel for the respondent, is unable to controvert the above legal submission of learned counsel for the appellant.
4. We have perused the relevant provision of Finance Ordinance, 2000 which confirms the statement of learned counsel for the appellant that section 194-A(b) which was made basis by the Tribunal for dismissal of appeal, was omitted much earlier to the passing of impugned order. It is thus clear that the appeal preferred by the appellant before the Tribunal could not have been dismissed on this ground.