MIAN IIAMID FAROOQ, J.---Seemingly aggrieved from order dated 22-4-2004, whereby appellant's application seeking leave to defend the suit, was dismissed and judgment and decree dated 25-5- 2004 for the recovery of Rs.24.62.669 together with costs and cost of funds passed by the Judge Banking Court, the appellants, on 10-7-2004, filed the present appeal before this Court. During the pendency of the appeal, Haji Rashid Mehmood filed the application (C.M. No.3-C of 2004), with the prayer that he may be impleaded as respondent No.2 in the appeal.
2. After arguing the matter at some length, both the learned counsel concede that the decretal amount has been deposited with the respondent-Bank and the decree, under appeal, has been satisfied. Admittedly, the respondent-Bank has recovered the decretal amount and the decree, under appeal stood satisfied, thus, the said decree has become in-executable. To our mind, the present appeal, which proceeds against inexecutable decree, cannot further progress, as no live issues are left to be decided by this Court and the appeal has become infructuous. Needless to add that the executing Court, under section 47, C.P.C. is empowered to decide all questions between the parties and relating to the execution. discharge or satisfaction of the decree.
3. In the above perspective, the present appeal stands dismissed having become infructuous, with no order as to costs.
C.M. No.3-C of 2004, C.M. No.4-C of 2004 As the appeal has been dismissed, therefore, these applications have also become infructuous, hence disposed of accordingly.