1. Deferred.
2 and 3. Granted.
4. On 2-8-2002. The complainant went to Police Station, Bahu Khoso and lodged F.I.R. Bearing Crime No,34 of 2000 alleging therein that about one year prior to lodging the F.I.R. At 10-00 a.m. The applicant along with two accused persons namely Fareed and Balochan armed with kalashnikovs snatched the cattle from his possession. The co-accused Ghulam Fareed filed bail application before this Court which was granted on 1-3-2002.
' In this background, the learned Advocate for the applicant has stated that the case of the applicant is identical to the case of co-accused Ghulam Fareed who has been granted bail by this Court, therefore, on the rule of consistency the applicant is also entitled to the concession of bail.
The learned Advocate for the State conceded the above position and has no objection to the grant of bail.
' The record supports the above contention. On perusal of the record it reveals that the case of the applicant is similar to that of co-accused Ghulam Fareed who has been granted bail by this Court therefore, the applicant is also entitled to the concession of bail an the rule of consistency.
Consequently, bail is granted to the applicant in the sum of Rs,one lac on furnishing solvent surety with P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court. The application is allowed.