Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
2005 MLD 444

IRFAN KHALID vs THE STATE

Citation2005 MLD 444
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Crl. Misc. No.288-M of 2004, in Cr. A. No.1648 of 2000,
Date2004-03-09
Judge(s)Asif Saeed Khan Khosa
ResultOrder accordingly

' Irfan Khalid petitioner is a convict in case F.I.R. No.328 of 1997 registered at Police Station Saddar, Daska, District Sialkot for offences under sections 148/302/149/109, P.P.C. He was convicted for an offence under section 308, P.P.C. Vide judgment dated 9-10-2000 rendered by the learned Sessions Judge, Sialkot and was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for fourteen years and to pay a sum of Rs.2,70,000 to the heirs of Muhammad Sharif deceased as Diyat. The benefit under section 382-B, Cr.P.C. Was extended to the petitioner. On 5-4-2002 Criminal Appeal No.1648 of 2000 preferred by the petitioner before this Court in that regard had been dismissed and subsequently on 7-5-2002 Jail Petition No.176 of 2002 filed by the petitioner before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan was also dismissed. The petitioner has now approached this Court for his release from the jail on the ground that he has already served out his entire sentence of imprisonment and has already spent more than six months in jail on account of nonpayment of Diyat.

2. During the pendency of this petition a report had been called for by this Court from the Superintendent, District Jail, Sialkot and the report so submitted shows that the petitioner had served out his entire sentence of imprisonment on 10-6-2003 and he is being detained in jail eversince only on account of non-payment of Diyat. It has already been held by this Court in the case of Abid Hussain and another v. Chairman, Pakistan Bait-ul-Mal and others (PLD 2002 Lahore 482) that a convict, after serving out his entire sentence of imprisonment cannot be detained in jail for more than six months on account of non-payment of Diyat. According to the learned Assistant Advocate-General the operation of the said judgment passed by this Court has not so far been suspended by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan which is already seized of an appeal against that judgment. In this view of the matter this petition is allowed and the Superintendent, District Jail, Sialkot is directed to release the petitioner from the jail forthwith if he is not required to be detained in connection with any other case. It may, however, be clarified that the petitioner's liability to pay Diyat shall remain intact and the relevant amount of Diyat can now be recovered from the petitioner in the manner provided for recovery of arrears of land revenue, as contemplated by the provisions of section 544-A, Cr.P.C. This petition is disposed of in these terms.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch