Pakistan Case Law← Search
2005 CLD 387

In the matter of: Messrs DEWAN KHALID TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED vs NOT

Citation2005 CLD 387
CourtMonopoly Control Authority
Case No.File No,8(267)INV/ (DD-R&I)/ MCA/ 84,
Date2003-09-06
Judge(s)Abdul Ghaffar, Muhammad Arshad Parwaiz, Tariq Farooq
ResultAppeal accepted

ORDER

1. ' Messrs Dewan Khalid Textile Mills Limited (the Undertaking) was asked to supply the information/ documents vide Letter No, 8(267)INV(Chief-R&I)MCA/84 dated February 13, 2002 but it failed to do so. The Undertaking was reminded vide letters of even number dated March 15 and April 15, 2002 but it again. Failed to supply the requisite information/documents. The Undertaking was therefore, served with Show-Cause Notice No,65 of 2001-2002 on May 27, 2002. The Undertaking supplied the information vide its letter dated May 31, 2002 but it did not respond to the show-cause notice. The case was fixed for hearing on 21-11-2002 but adjourned on the written request of the Undertaking.

2. The case was again fixed for hearing on 13-1-2003. Barrister Qasim Ali Chowhan, appeared on behalf of the respondent Undertaking and requested the Authority for allowing two days time i.e. Up to 15-1-2003 for submission of complete information. The Authority, acceding to his request, allowed time up to 15-1-2003 and adjourned the case for that date.

3. ' On 15-1-2003 Barrister Qasim Ali Chowhan argued the case. He admitted that the requisite information was not supplied by the Undertaking in time and was actually supplied vide its letter dated May 31, 2002. The Authority adjourned the matter for date in office.

4. ' The matter was finally fixed for hearing on 19-6-2003 and hearing notice was issued to the Undertaking on June 06, 2003 but adjourned by the Authority for July 22, 2003.

5. ' On July 22, 2003 Barrister Qasim Ali Chowhan, General Manager and Syed Nasik Ijaz Gilani, Advocate/ authorized representative appeared on behalf of the respondent Undertaking and admitted that the Undertaking could not supply the requisite information within the stipulated period and it supplied the said information vide its letter dated May 31, 2002 i.e. After the date of issue of show-cause notice by the Authority. They tendered apology for the delay on the part of the respondent Undertaking and requested the Authority for condonation of the delay.

6. ' The Authority noted that the Undertaking was liable to supply the information prescribed under the Monopoly Control Authority (Supply of Information) Rules, 1995 for the year ended in September 2001 by 31st March, 2002 but it failed to do so. It also failed to supply the information called for under section 21 of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices (Control and Prevention)

7. Ordinance, 1970.

8. ' In the light of the above facts, the Authority ordered for imposing a penalty of Rs.20,000 (Rupees twenty thousand only) under section 19(1)(a) of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices (Control and Prevention) Ordinance, 1970, on the Undertaking. The penalty shall be paid within one month from the date of the order.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
Disclaimer·Privacy·Terms·Search