1. FAKHRUDDIN G. EBRAIRM, J.-The facts .Giving rise to this petition are ' that the workman employed in the respondent hotel formed a registered Trade Union in January 1970 following, which they gave; a notice under
(c) Constitution of Pakistan (1973)- -- Art. 199-Jurisdiction of High Court under Art. 199-Court not . Called upon to go into investigation of facts.-[Jurisdiction]. [p. 470]C Begun Nasrat Bhutto vChief of Army Staff any another PLD 1977 SC 657 and Z. A. Bhutto v. The State PLD 1978 SC 40 ref.
(d) Martial Law Order, 1977 [M. L. A. Zone 'C']- No. 4 [as reconstituted by Martial Law Order No. 37 of 1978], read with Pakistan Army Act Rules, 1954 -Martial Law Courts ---Courts of expediency and exigency-Such Courts, however, required to act within limits laid down in M. L. O. No. 4 as to jurisdiction and Pakistan Army Act Rules as to procedure-Action of such Courts, so long as limits not transgressed, not open to correction.- [Jurisdiction --Practice and procedure].
2. The Martial Law Courts are Courts of expediency and exigency and sophistications of trial and procedure are not to be looked into in the cases decided by such Courts. They are, however, required to act within the limits laid down in the Martial Law Order No. 4, as to their jurisdiction, and the Pakistan Army Act Rules, as to the procedure to be followed by them, and so long such limits are not transgressed their actions are not open to correction.
3. Rustam Ali v. Martial Law Administrator PLD 1978 Kar. 736 ; Nazir Ahmed v. Lt: Col. Abbas Ali Khan PLD 1978 Kar. 777 and Khudiadad vMartial Law Administrator PLD 1978 Quetta 177 ref.
4. Rashid Akhutrd for Petitioner.
5. Usman Ghani for A. G. With Abbas H. Farooqul for Respondents.
6. Date of hearing : 15th October 1978.