Pakistan Case Law← Search
2005 YLR 1955

GHULAM ALI vs GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Chief Secretary, Sindh

Citation2005 YLR 1955
CourtSindh High Court
Case No.C.P. No.D-183 of 2605
Date2004-12-07
Judge(s)Muhammad Mujeebullah Siddiqui, Muhammad Moosa K. Laghari
ResultOrder accordingly

ORDER

1. ' Through this petition it has been alleged that the District Police Nawab Shah at the behest of some members of the ruling party is causing harassment to the petitioner, who is brother of a sitting M.P.A. And at present is a member of the opposition party.

2. Briefly stated the relevant facts for the purpose of this petition are that Ghulam Haider was arrested in Crime No.21 of 2005 Pollee Station, Taluka Nawab Shah for commission of offence under section 364, P.P.C. He was granted bail by the Court on 12-5-2005 but surety was not furnished on behalf of accused Ghulam Haider Chandio, on account of apprehension that as soon as he is released from jail, he will be arrested in some other case. There was a particular apprehension of his arrest in Crime No.28 of 2002, Police'Station, Sakrand under section 302, P.P.C. It is stated by Mr. Chohan, learned counsel for the petitioner that the District police had surrounded the District Jail Nawab Shah with police force in 15 mobiles. However, after issuance of notice by this Court in this petition, the police force disbursed. The surety was furnished in Crime No.21 of 2005 on 26-5-2005 and on the same day Ghulam Haider Chandio was released. Thereafter he has not been arrested in any, case. The learned counsel for the petitioner had initially expressed apprehension that Ghulam Haider may be arrested in Crime No.28 of 2002 Police Station, Sakrand and subsequently he stated that a fresh F.I.R. Being Crime No.32 of 2005 has been registered at Police Station, Sakrand and there is apprehension that Ghulam Haider Chandio may be arrested in the said F.I.R.

3. Mr. Jang Sher Rana, D.S.P., Headquarter Nawab Shah, has given a. Very clear statement to the effect that Ghulam Haider Chandio is not required in Crime B No.28 of 2002 or Crime No.32 of 2005 and has further stated that as of today he is not required in any other case by Nawab Shah police.

4. In the above circumstances were are of the opinion that the purpose of the petition has been served and the petition stands disposed of accordingly, along with the listed applications.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
Disclaimer·Privacy·Terms·Search