' Submits that only in effective firing is attributed to the petitioner, that he was armed with.
Klashnikov according to the F.I.R. But no empty of Klashinkov was recovered from the spot, that no recovery of Klashnikov was effected from him and that he has been placed in Column No.2 of the challan.
2. Learned State counsel assisted by learned counsel for the complainant submits that petitioner is named in the F.I.R., specific role is attributed to him, he was the member of an unlawful assembly, that it is a case of double murder, that he had been playing hide and seek with the Court by making different applications, that offence falls within the ambit of section 497(1), Cr.P.C. And moreover opinion of the police is not binding on the Courts.
3. Heard. Though petitioner is named in the F.I.R. And according to the F.I.R. He was armed with Klashnokov but no empty of Klashnikov was recovered from the spot, no Klashinkov was recovered from him, he has been found innocent and has been placed in Column No. 2 of the challan, so in my opinion, case of the petitioner is of further inquiry falling under subsection (2) of section 497, Cr.P.C., therefore, this petition is accepted. Petitioner is allowed bail subject to furnishing bail bonds to the tune of Rs.1,00,000 (one lac) with two sureties in the like-amount to the satisfaction of trial Court. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.