' IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, J.---This petition for leave to appeal has been filed against the judgment dated 18th March, 1999 passed by Lahore High Court, Lahore, whereby Intra-Court Appeal filed by petitioner has been dismissed.
2. Learned counsel appearing for petitioner addressed arguments at a considerable length during course whereof she stated that on behalf ofpetitioner, she contemplates to file a complaint before the competent Court of jurisdiction but her problem is that there are certain observations made by the learned Division Bench of Lahore High Court, Lahore in the impugned judgment on account of which there is probability that might relief she wanted to get, would not be granted. She further stated that if this Court observes that if such complaint is filed by petitioner, that Would be taken into consideration independently, in accordance with law and without being influenced in any manner from the observation made by the learned High Court in impugned judgment, she would not press this petition.
3. We have heard the learned counsel and have taken into consideration the statement so made by her. In this behalf suffice it to say that the observations made in the impugned judgment are of tentative nature. However, we would like to observe that if such complaint is filed by complainant for the redressal of grievance, that would be dealt A with independently, in accordance with the law, without being influenced from the observations made by the learned High Court in the impugned judgment.
' Petition is dismissed as withdrawn in view of observation made hereinabove.