KHAWAJA MUHAMMAD SHARIF, J.~ Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that according to the F.I.R, petitioner had fired three shots which did not hit the body of the injured and instead of that hit the clothes of the injured/P.W. He submits that he was arrested on 4.9.2002. Ghulam has been submitted against .Him and petitioner is no more required by the Police.
2. On the other hand, learned State counsel submits that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R, with a specific role, Offence falls within the Prohibitory Clause of Section 497(1), Cr.P.C.
3. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. Though the petitioner fired on the injured/P.W.
But fortunately the same did not hit this body, and the same hit his clothes. Petitioner is behind the bar for the last 4 months. Case of the petitioner in my opinion, is of further inquiry, ln this view of the matter this petition is accepted and the petitioner is allowed bail in the sum of Rs.50,000/ with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of Trial Court.