' The petitioner and one Akhtar Hussain stand involved in case F.I.R. No.6 of 2004, dated 10-1-2004 registered under section 337-A(i) and A(iii) read with section 34, P.P.C. At Police Station, Chenab Nagar, District Jhang.
2. The allegation against the ipetitioner is that he hit the complainant on his nose as a result of which blood oozed I out. The co-accused of the petitionerhas been granted bail by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chiniot, vide order dated 21-2-2004, whereas vide the same order the petitioner was declined bail.
3. The bail is sought on the ground that the allegations against the petitioner are false, that the F.I.R.
Was lodged with the unexplained delay of three days, that the complainant is the aggressor, that it is a case of cross-version and that the case against the petitioner squarely falls under section 497(2), Cr.P.C. Requiring further probe into his guilt.
4. Learned State counsel defended the impugned order, contending Ithat the petitioner caused injury to the complainant, and that sufficient material is On record which connects him with the comriission of offence.
5. I have considered the contentions perused the record. The crops-version of the learned counsel for the parties and against the complainant in this , case has been recorded which is , pending investigation. On Court query, the police officer present in Court, stated that the occurrence took place in the land in possession of the petitioner. Thus it is yet to be decided as to which is the aggressor party. In this view of the matter, the case against the petitioner requires further inquiry.
6. For what has been stated above, this petition is allowed and the petitioner is admitted to bail provided he furnishes bail bonds in the sum of Rs.50,000 with one surety in the like amount to the