' Respondents Nos.1 to 11 vide impugned judgment, dated 26-2-2004 were acquitted by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Sheikhupura, on the basis of compromise having been effected between the legal heirs of the deceased in case F.I.R. No,357, dated 13-1-2000 under sections 302, 324, 506. 186, 148, 149, P.P.C. Registered at Police Station Shahkot District Sheikhupura. Feeling aggrieved by the respondents' acquittal the appellant who is father (sic) of the deceased had filed this appeal.
2. We have heard the appellant's counsel who has mainly argued that the learned trial Court while allowing the respondents' application for acquittal on the basis of compromise did not record the statements of the legal heirs of Taj Din deceased to the effect that they had effected compromise with the respondents and as such the order of acquittal has been passed on illegal premises and is not sustainable.
3. The impugned judgment reveals the names of legal heirs of Taj Din deceased. During the course of hearing of a bail petition all the legal heirs settled Diyat amount of Rs,3,00,000 which was paid to them and then they waived their right of Qisas and got recorded their statements before learned Addl. Sessions Judge Sheikhupura on 13-1-2001 to the effect that they had effected compromise with the respondents and consequently they were enlarged on bail. The legal heirs of-the deceased after having effected compromise and receiving Diyat amount cannot be allowed to withdraw from the compromise, therefore, the learned trial Court had rightly recorded the respondents' acquittal on the statements regarding compromise of legal heirs of the deceased recorded on 13-1-2001 during bail proceedings. The appeal is dismissed in limine.