Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
1970 SCMR 87

SARDARA AND Others vs GHULAM RASUL AND Another

Citation1970 SCMR 87
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 276 of 1967
Date1967-10-26
Judge(s)Alvin R. Cornelius, Dr. Sheikh Abdul Rahman
ResultLeave refused

ORDER

1. CORNELIUS, C. J.-The petitioners twelve in number were granted bail by a Sessions Court of Gujrat.

2. They were charged for offences of murder and attempt to murder while being members of an unlawful assembly. Six of them were alleged to have carried guns, and five others to have carried lathis. The twelfth Noora was alleged to have deliberately. Created a situation in which the attack could be made.

3. A learned Single Judge in the High Court cancelled the bail orders, holding that the reasons given by the Sessions Judge lacked validity. The Sessions Judge had relied on reports of the Crimes Branch of the Police as well as that the shots fired by certain of the petitioners had only caused minor injuries to companions of the deceased. Leave is sought to appeal against the High Court's order.

4. The petition is not pressed in regard to the six men who were alleged to have carried guns, but as to the five alleged lathi-men, it is said that they caused no injury, and moreover their presence was not necessary for carrying out the alleged design, as there were only four men in the party to be attacked. A plea that Noora's name too had been falsely included, was also made.

5. The allegation against Noora is a substantial part of the prosecution case, and makes out abetment. As to the lathi-men, it cannot be said without a full examination through evidence, of all the circumstances, that their presence was superfluous. The expectation may have been that more than four persons had to be overcome, and it is possible too that they went to make sure of the success of the enterprise in case the shots from fire-arms failed to find their mark.

6. A correct discretion has been exercised in canceling the bail granted by the Sessions Court. We dismiss this petition.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch