' MUNIR A. SHEIKH, J.---Decree dated 6-11-1983 was obtained by the petitioners in a suit filed by them on 5-11-1983 against Muhammad Nazir, the original owner of the land on the basis of alleged consent of said Muhammad Nazir to the effect that the land had been gifted by him to the petitioners. Muhammad Nazir died on 16-8-1985. Admittedly, no mutation was got sanctioned either on the basis of the original gift allegedly made by Muhammad Nazir before filing of the suit on 5-11-1983 or on the basis of the said consent decree till the death of Muhammad Nazir on 16-8- 1985. The petitioners are the nephews of Muhammad Nazir from his brother Muhammad Yaqoob whereas respondents 1 and 2 are also his nephew and niece from his other brotherMuhammad Bashir who filed application under section 12(2), C.P.C. On 24-4-1988 that the said decree was the result of fraud.
2. The trial Court after considering the evidence -came to the conclusion that consent decree had been obtained through fraud, therefore, the same was not sustainable. Through order dated 19-11- 1989, the said application was accepted and the consent decree was set aside. Revision Petition filed by the petitioners was accepted by the learned Additional District Judge, through order dated 18-7-1990 which has been set aside in Constitutional petition filed by the respondents by the learned Judge in Chambers of the High Court through the impugned judgment dated 10-1-2002 by holding that the learned Additional District Judge had misread the evidence on the record, therefore, his judgment was without lawful authority.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has not been able to persuade us that the findings recorded by the trial Court and affirmed by the High Court suffer from any illegality, therefore, no case has been made out for interference, for no evidence has either been misread or misconstrued.