Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
2004 CLD 493

MUHAMMAD YUSUF vs ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN LTD. through Manager and

Citation2004 CLD 493
CourtLahore High Court
Judge(s)Abdul Shakoor Paracha, Maulvi Anwar-ul-Haq
ResultAppeal allowed

' MAULVI ANWARUL HAQ, J.---In the course of execution of a decree passed in favour of the respondent No,1-Bank and against the remaining respondents/ judgment-debtor, the appellant filed an objection petition stating that he is a share-holder in the property that was mortgaged and later ordered to be sold. The learned trial Court took up the application on 6-6-2000 and proceeded to issue a notice to the respondents. However, a condition was imposed that this will be subject to deposit of the decretal amount.

2. Learned counsel contends that the said condition could not have been imposed in view of the clear provisions of section 18 of the Banking Companies (Recovery of Loans, Advances, Credits and Finances) Act, 1997. No one has turned up for the respondent No,1-Bank who is represented by a learned counsel whose name stands duly listed in the cause list for today but no one has turned up despite several calls.

3. We have given some thought to the said contention of the learned counsel and find that the same is fully borne out from the provision of said section 18. A reading of section 18(6) would show that the matter of investigation of claims and objections is to be governed by the said subsection

(6) of section 18 of the said Act notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Now in terms of the said provision of law, the objections ought to be investigated and decided within 30 days and in case at the end of the inquiry /trial the objection is found to be mala fide, a penalty can be imposed upto 20% of the sale price of the property for the delay caused in the execution of the decree.

4. Having thus examined the said legal question arising in this case, we do agree with the learned counsel that the impugned order cannot be sustained. This E.F.A. Is accordingly allowed and the impugned order imposing a condition of deposit of decretal amount for issuance of a notice in the said objection petition is set aside. A copy of this order be immediately remitted to the learned Banking Court who shall immediately proceed further in the matter in accordance with section 18(6) of the said Act No,XV of 1997. It is clarified here that the auction/sale of the property other than the alleged share of the appellant claimed by him shall proceed further in accordance with law. No orders as to costs.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch