' TANVIR AHMED KHAN, J.---Leave to appeal is sought against the judgment dated 21st December, 1999 whereby learned Chairman of the Punjab Service Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner.
2. Facts briefly are that petitioner was charge-sheeted on 10-1-1994 for his continued absence from duty which he did not respond in spite of notice. The competent authority, after examining his entire record, dismissed him from service through an order w.e.f, 28th of February, 1994. He filed appeals before D.I.-G. As well as before I.-G., both of which were rejected as he could not render explanation for his long absence. He filed an appeal before the Service Tribunal which has been dismissed not only being barred out time but also on merit through impugned judgment. Hence this petition for leave to appeal.
3. It is reflected from the impugned order that his record is full of red entries showing unauthorized continued absence. He was fined many a times and was earlier dismissed from service. He, however, was reinstated subsequently. The learned Tribunal has rightly held that he did not have any interest in the Government service particularly so when it is a disciplinary force.
4. Apart from this, the points urged by the learned counsel for the petitioner does not bring his case within the purview of Article 212(iii) of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan. Resultantly for what has been stated above, the petition is dismissed and leave is refused.